Legal Opinion

Beadle v. Sage Land & Improvement Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1905No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. Assumpsit by Charles S. Beadle against the Sage Land & Improvement Company for commissions on the sale of certain real estate. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

In November, 1902, defendant sold a large tract of land situated in Chippewa county, in this State, to the Northwestern Timber Land Company. Plaintiff, under the claim that he was entitled to a commission for making said sale, brought this suit. This suit was tried before a jury, and a verdict directed in defendant’s favor. Plaintiff asks us to reverse the judgment entered on said verdict. He insists that the evidence shows or warrants the inference that he was the procuring cause of the sale, and that, by virtue of a contract between him and defendant, he was entitled to a commission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Newton v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Gray v. Clark & PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Champion Et Ux. v. Hammer Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Craib v. Committee on National Missions of the Presbytery of Detroit of the United Presbyterian Church, U.S.A.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BloodMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Holmes Realty Co. v. SilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. People's Ice & Fuel Co. v. Field Pure Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API