Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Smith v. Redman

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 27, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-120PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

Raymond R. Smith, a state prisoner, has petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He claims that his Delaware Superior Court conviction for theft was premised on a constitutionally impermissible simultaneous “showup” before three witnesses. The Delaware Supreme Court rejected this same contention in Smith v. State, Del.Supr., 352 A.2d 765 (1976), and, accordingly, petitioner has exhausted his available state remedies. Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 92 S.Ct. 509, 30 L.Ed.2d 438 (1971).

While returning from lunch on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Mitchell A. KRAMER and David C. Harrison v. SCIENTIFIC CONTROL CORP. Et Al. Appeal of ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Nowell A. Brathwaite v. John R. Manson, Commissioner of Correction of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Jones v. WestDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
  3. Bratcher v. McCrayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API