Legal Opinion

In re Schwartz

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 19, 1925No. 135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We feel assured that the order complained of was erroneous. We pass by the point that the motion was directed only against Mr. Cohen, as trustee, while the order affected injuriously Mr. Cohen individually, and we pass to the really important question as to whether, under the circumstances above shown, the court had any power or authority to enter a summary judgment against Mr. Cohen and award execution against his own proper goods.

Mr. Cohen had been discharged as trustee, the estate was closed, and the only method by which any further administration of the assets in bankruptcy, or of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Rochester Sanitarium & Baths Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  2. In re GraffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. In re HollinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  4. United States v. SondheimDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1910
  5. In re Cadenas & CoeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Consupak, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  2. In Re Fox West Coast TheatresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  3. Montaigne v. Rossvill Alcohol & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. In re HannevigDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API