Legal Opinion

AdTrader, Inc. v. Google LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 1, 2022No. 5:17-cv-07082Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 ADTRADER, INC., et al., Case No. 17-cv-07082-BLF 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND GRANTING MOTION FOR 10 GOOGLE LLC, ATTORNEY FEES, EXPENSES, AND SERVICE AWARD 11 Defendant. [Re: ECF Nos. 401, 399] 12 13 Before the Court are (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Settlement (“Final 14 Approval Motion”) and (2) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney Fees, Expenses, and Service Award 15 (“Fee Motion”). See ECF Nos. 401, 399. Seventeen opt-outs have been filed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API