Legal Opinion

Albert v. Ledet

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1974No. 9676PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.*

The plaintiff, Clarence J. Albert, Jr., brings this suit to recover from the defendant, Leo C. Ledet, the alleged balance due under a contract, an averred supplement thereto, and for construction extras beyond the contract, for the construction of a residence in the City of Houma, La. The original contract, dated October 18, 1967 called for the sum of $57,625.00, allegedly supplemented to the extent of $11,246.00 for additions; and construction items termed “extras” in the sum of $9,171.72. The aggregate of these three figures reaches the amount of $78,042.72. Plaintiff claims…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lee v. National Cylinder Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Wendel v. MayburyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Lagasse v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. Mitchell Lulich Construction Co. v. BallaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  5. Mitchell Lulich Construction Co. v. BallayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ledet v. AlbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API