Albert v. Ledet
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.*
The plaintiff, Clarence J. Albert, Jr., brings this suit to recover from the defendant, Leo C. Ledet, the alleged balance due under a contract, an averred supplement thereto, and for construction extras beyond the contract, for the construction of a residence in the City of Houma, La. The original contract, dated October 18, 1967 called for the sum of $57,625.00, allegedly supplemented to the extent of $11,246.00 for additions; and construction items termed “extras” in the sum of $9,171.72. The aggregate of these three figures reaches the amount of $78,042.72. Plaintiff claims…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lee v. National Cylinder Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
- Wendel v. MayburyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lagasse v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Mitchell Lulich Construction Co. v. BallaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Mitchell Lulich Construction Co. v. BallayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ledet v. AlbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975