People v. Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
We affirm. “[T]he purpose of CPL 710.30 is to inform a defendant that the People intend to offer evidence of a statement to a public officer at trial so that a timely motion to suppress the evidence may be made” (People v Rodney, 85 NY2d 289, 291-292 [1995]; see People v Wilhelm, 34 AD3d 40, 44 [2006]). Here, the People provided CPL 710.30 notice regarding statements made by defendant to police. At the Huntley hearing, Goff testified that when he was doing a pat-down of defendant, she made a *1178statement to him to the effect that he was inappropriately touching her. This particular statement had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. RodneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. MeneganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. BowesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. SydlarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. OrmsbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. WhiteCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.