Compton v. Perkins
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
A narrative of the facts will enable us to state in a better manner our disposition of the assignments of error. The complaint names as defendants twenty-four individuals, but since only two of them, J. W. Perkins and Carrie B. Perkins, have appealed, we shall, for convenience, refer to them as the defendants.
J. W. Perkins came to Roseburg in 1909 where he engaged in the investment business. Some years previously he had lived in the state of Indiana where, according to his testimony, he acquired information about the operation of oil wells. Upon locating in Roseburg, he displayed interest in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Benedict v. RatnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Converse v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Glenn v. LiggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Harrigan v. BergdollSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bakee Production Credit Ass'n v. Long Creek Meat Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Plummer v. Donald M. Drake Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Jernberg v. Santiam Remanufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Sierra Club v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior and James T. Lynn, Director of Office of Management and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.