Legal Opinion

Baum v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 21, 1972Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeonard H. Sandler, J.

In this action, submitted to this court on stipulated facts supplemented as to one circumstance by testimony, plaintiff seeks reimbursement under a major medical expense group policy issued by defendant to the State of New York as employer on October 18,1971, for expenses incurred in connection with services rendered by a certified psychologist.

At the outset, two critical facts seem relatively free from doubt. (1) Plaintiff would be entitled to the reimbursement claimed if the services in question had been rendered by a licensed physician rather than a certified psychologist. (2) The policy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mulligan v. Travelers Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Gladstone v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  3. Flax v. O'DeaNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API