Legal Opinion

Motley v. Southern Finishing & Warehouse Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Civil ACTION for damages tried before Robinson, J., and a jury at January, 1898, Special Term of Guilford Superior Court. There was a verdict followed by judgment for the plaintiffs and defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Furches, J.:

Plaintiffs are tobacco dealers and defendant is a chartered warehouse company. Plaintiffs, at the solicitation of defendant deposited a quantity of leaf tobacco in defendant’s warehouse and took the following receipt therefor: ‘‘Greensboro, N. C., Oct. 16, 1894. Received in store from J. S. Cobb & Co., 73 hogsheads leaf tobacco, subject only to the order hereon of J. S. Cobb & Co. and the surrender of this receipt, and payment of charges. Southern Finishing & Warehouse Co., J. W. Lindau, Secretary.”

This tobacco remained in defendant’s warehouse until the first of June, 1895, when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simonton v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Commissioners of Stanly County v. SnuggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Staton v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Duncan v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Holt Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Arthur Jordan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. State v. FeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Plott v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Edgerton v. Hood Ex Rel. Rutherford County Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API