Legal Opinion

Fordtran v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1911Published

Error to District Court, Harris County; Norman G. Kittrell, Judge. Action by W. B. Cunningham against W. B. Fordtran and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

On November 23, 1907, Bas-sett Blakley, acting by his agent, W. B. Fordtran,- both plaintiffs in error, conveyed by general warranty deed to W. B. Cunningham, defendant in error, certain premises in city of Houston. The property, while standing in name of Blakley, in fact belonged to Fordtran. The consideration expressed in the conveyance was the payment of $250 cash, the conveyance by Cunningham of certain lots, valued at $450, and transfer of certain notes, valued at $466.66, execution of certain vendor’s lien notes, and assumption by Cunningham of a lien of $2,600, and interest thereon,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irvine v. GradyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Presidio County v. ShockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API