Legal Opinion

D.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 27, 2002No. 3D02-818PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant D.G., a juvenile (“D.G.”), appeals his adjudication of delinquency claiming the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress tangible evidence. We reverse finding D.G. was searched pursuant to an illegal arrest, and thus the drugs found on his person should have been suppressed.

D.G. was charged by petition with possession of cocaine and resisting arrest without violence, after an officer observed him chasing another person down a street late one night. When confronted by the police officer, D.G. told the officer that he was chasing the third person because that person owed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Slydell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. State v. ArnoldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. O.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. D.T.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. M.M.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Valdes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. DG v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API