Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Kretschmer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1973No. 7 March Term 1973, Docket No. 54,200Published

1Opinion of the Court

389 Mich. 363 (1973)

207 N.W.2d 316

RIZZO

v.

KRETSCHMER

No. 7 March Term 1973, Docket No. 54,200.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 25, 1973.

Lopatin, Miller, Binders & Freedman (Michael H. Feiler, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Sullivan, Sullivan, Ranger & Ward, for defendant Kretschmer.

Baun & Barton, for defendant Astrolfi.

Plunkett, Cooney, Rutt & Peacock (by John A. Demoss and Sarah Wildgen Sweet), for defendant Plonka.

WILLIAMS, J.

There are three issues in this case. The first is what must a defendant, on a motion for summary judgment after original pleadings, interrogatories and depositions but…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Rizzo v. KretschmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. American Parts Co., Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Butrick v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API