Byrd v. State

By this appeal, the defendant seeks review of his conviction of breaking and en*727try of a truck with intent to commit grand larceny. He was also convicted of petit larceny.

We affirm the breaking and entry conviction. The proof was sufficient to establish a breaking and entry of the vehicle owned by the entity alleged in the information, and we do not find any merit in the contention that the larceny occurred of property owned by another. Edwards v. State, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 47; § 810.-05, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

As to the misdemeanor conviction, pursuant to § 6(3), Article V, Constitution of the…