Chenevert v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion
ON THE MERITS
Standard of Review
Appellate courts review motions for summary judgment de novo, using the identical criteria that -govern the trial court’s consideration of whether summary ' judgment is appropriate.- Samaha v. Ran, 07-1726 (La. 2/26/08), 977 So.2d 880. The reviewing court, therefore, is tasked with determining whether, “the motion, memorandum-, and supporting documents show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact and that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” La.Code Civ.P. art. 966(A)(3). -
An insurer seeking to avoid coverage through summary judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Keelen v. State, Dept. of Culture, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Backhus v. Transit Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Dore v. TugwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Halphen v. BorjaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.