Legal Opinion

Peacock v. Feltman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 1, 1927No. Gen. No. 30, 934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch

This appeal is from a finding and judgment for defendants in a forcible detainer proceeding, brought to recover possession of the building known as No. 118 South State Street, Chicago, because of alleged violations of the covenants in the lease.

The lease was made in 1917. By its terms, Augusta Lehmann (plaintiffs’ mother, who died in 1918) leased the building to The Curme-Feltman Shoe Company, an Indiana corporation, Arthur H. Curme and Charles H. Feltman, for 15 years from January 1, 1918, “to be occupied for shoe store and general mercantile purposes”; and the lessees covenanted and agreed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Webster v. NicholsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Vintaloro v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ireland v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Palmer v. City Livery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Epstein v. YoderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Earp v. SchmitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  3. Housing Authority for La Salle County v. LittleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Chapman v. WoolseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  5. Justine Realty Co. v. American Can Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API