Legal Opinion
Leiching v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 13, 1994No. 1:92-cv-01170PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McAVOY, Chief Judge.
Defendant and third party plaintiff Conrail has moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), for reconsideration of an Order of this court dated March 19, 1994, which granted summary judgment in favor of third party defendants Miron Building Products and Big V Supermarkets. In the alternative, Conrail has requested leave to rear-gue the summary judgment motion.
There are generally only three circumstances under which a court will agree to reconsider a prior decision. To successfully prevail, the moving party must show the existence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Akins v. Glens Falls City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Scurti v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- National Life Insurance Company v. Irene Solomon and Louis Schuster as Trustee of the S & L Pension trust-r.t.b. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bowen v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2005