Legal Opinion
Ramm v. Rowland
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided April 20, 1987No. Civ. A. H-85-4553PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HITTNER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or, Alternatively, Motion to Transfer. Having considered the pleadings on file, the oral arguments and representations made on the record at the motion conference, and the law applicable thereto, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s motion should be, and is hereby, DENIED.
I. FACTS
In late October of 1988, Defendant contacted the Plaintiff’s wife in Texas and discussed opening a trading account for her. In January of 1984, Plaintiff's wife, Lynn Ruth Ramm, met with Defendant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Memorial Hospital System v. Fisher Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Denmark v. TzimasDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994
- Thomas v. SkripDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012
- Long v. Grafton Executive Search, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2003
- Memorial Hospital System v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of ArkansasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.