Legal Opinion
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 28, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00225Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE RAYFORD, 1:19-cv-00225-AWI-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER INFORMING PLAINTIFF THAT HE MAY NOT ADD INFORMATION PIECEMEAL 13 vs. TO THE COMPLAINT 14 SHERMAN, et al., ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S DECLARATION AS IMPROPERLY FILED 15 (ECF No. 38.) Defendants. 16 ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND COMPLAINT FORM TO PLAINTIFF 17 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Eugene Rayford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 20 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 7, 2019, Plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bowles v. ReadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- May v. EnomotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.