Herbert A. Nieman & Co. v. Holton & Hunkel Greenhouse Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
Upon this appeal the defendant makes two principal contentions: (1) That the evidence does not sustain the court’s findings as to damages; (2) that under the undisputed facts, the damages could not exceed $66.25.(1) While there is a. wide discrepancy as to the damage done by the excavation and removal of the earth, as between the witnesses for the plaintiff and those for the defendant, it cannot be said that the testimony which tends to support the conclusion reached by the trial court is incredible or that the witnesses are unworthy of belief. Therefore we cannot disturb the findings of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Birmingham v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Pedelty v. Wisconsin Zinc Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Miller v. NealeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ghione v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Klein v. GarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- William H. Loehde and Jessie Carolyn Loehde v. Wisconsin River Power Company, a Wisconsin Corporation, and Walter BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962