Fox v. Lindenman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Action by Henry Fox against Samuel Lindenman and others. Judgment for plaintiff. On motion to compel plaintiff’s attorneys to accept service of notice of appeal. Motion granted. Argued December term, 1913, before SEABURY, GUY, and BI-JUR, JJ.
1Per curiam
This is a motion to compel the plaintiff’s attorneys to accept service of notice of appeal from the judgment in this action. A judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants was entered upon a verdict of a jury in the City Court, and notice of entry thereof was given to defendant’s attorneys on June 19, 1913. The time to appeal from such judgment would have expired upon June 29, 1913, except, by reason of that day falling upon Sunday, the time was extended until June 30, 1913 (Stat. Const. Law, c. 347, Laws 1910). Upon a motion made by the defendants upon the ground that a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gelder v. International Ore Treating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Gelder v. National Surety Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
- Regierer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912