Taylor v. Finlayson
Supreme Court of Florida
1DissentWhitfield, C. J.
(dissenting in part). — “In the absence of a statute, or rule of court made in compliance with law, no decree in chancery for a deficiency, after a sale of the mortgaged property could be entered in a court of equity, unless it be that the debt, without the mortgage, is such that a court of chancery would have jurisdiction of it, and could render a decree for it.” Webber v. Blanc, 39 Fla. 224, 22 So. 655.
“Denial of a deficiency decree in a mortgage foreclosure does not affect the obligation involved, but pertains only to the remedy for its enforcement.” Taylor v. Prine, 101 Fla. 967, 132 So.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Proctor v. HearneSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Webber v. BlancSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- Taylor, Jr. v. PrineSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Drew v. HobbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Tischler v. Kurtz Bros.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.