Legal Opinion

DeFusco v. Todesca Forte, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 21, 1996No. 95-329-AppealPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This ease came before a hearing panel of this Court for oral argument on September 25, 1996, pursuant to an order directing the appellant-plaintiffs, Kimberly and John De-Fusco, to appear and show cause why the issues raised in their appeal from a Superior Court final entry of summary judgment in favor of the state should not be summarily decided.

After hearing the arguments of counsel and considering the memoranda, submitted by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. The issues raised in the appeal will be decided at this time.

On February 25, 1989, Kimberly…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haley v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  2. Ryan v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Knudsen v. WarnerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  4. Boland v. Town of TivertonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Houle v. Galloway School Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stone v. North Carolina Department of LaborSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Berman v. SitrinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  3. Toegemann v. City of Providence.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Brindamour v. City of WarwickSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  5. Moses v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API