Legal Opinion

Coffee v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided March 4, 2020No. 4:18-cv-00028Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION CONNIE JEAN COFFEE, } } Plaintiff, } } v. } Case No.: 4:18-cv-00028-MHH } ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of } the Social Security Administration,1 } } Defendant. } MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c), plaintiff Connie Jean Coffee seeks judicial review of a final adverse decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The Commissioner denied Ms. Coffee’s claim for supplemental security income. For the reasons stated below, the Court remands the Commissioner’s decision for additional proceedings. 1 The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Winschel v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Renee S. Phillips v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Billy D. Crawford v. Comm. of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API