Legal Opinion

Crane v. Whittemore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Lehman v. ¡Strassburger, 3 Cent. L. J. 134; JBrooles v. Martin, 2 Wall. 78.

1Opinion of the CourtHateen, J.

This is an action to recover an amount of money which the plaintiffs claim is due them from the defendant Waterman for their services, as brokers, in procuring for him a purchaser for 1,000 barrels of pork. The petition alleges that plaintiffs were employed for that purpose ; sets out that there was an agreement to pay them one-half of one per cent on the price value of the pork; that the plaintiffs, after finding one Buckland as such purchaser, brought the two parties together, and that Buckland was accepted by Waterman. The answer, after denying plaintiffs’ aver-ments, sets up that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Waterman v. BucklandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Curran v. DownsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pape v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Earl v. HowellCity of New York Municipal Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API