State v. Truba
Supreme Court of Vermont
Information charging the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury at the September Term, 1914, Washington County, Miles, J., presiding. Verdict, guilty; and judgment thereon. The respondent excepted. The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
At the September Term of Washington C.ounty Court, this respondent was convicted of illegal liquor selling. Before the trial began, at the respondent’s request the State’s attorney filed a specification therein charging sales “on several occasions during the past summer” to certain persons named. When evidence was offered by the State to establish the offences so specified, the respondent objected, and' insisted that the specification was insufficient, and that the State should be restricted to some particular date. This objection was overruled and the respondent excepted. The record shows…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Havenor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Thrawley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Cannon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MinerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- State v. LapanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- French v. NelsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
- State v. LavalleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.