Legal Opinion
Buresch v. American LaFrance
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 27, 1968No. Civ. A. 67-1382PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
In this civil proceeding, the matter before the court is the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his complaint in order to sue the third-party defendant who was brought upon the record by the original defendant. No diversity of citizenship exists between the plaintiff and third-party defendant.
A complete hearing has been held in open court, and the court has reviewed the briefs and the prevailing law relative to this question. Although it is true, as the third-party defendant alleges, that the weight of authority indicates that there must be diversity of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herbert Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
3Cited by15 opinions
- Revere Copper and Brass Incorporated v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Third-Party v. George A. Fuller Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Kenrose Mfg. Co., Inc., a New York Corporation v. Fred Whitaker Company, Inc. v. Kilodyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Curtis Fawvor v. Texaco, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party v. Foster Wheeler Corporation, Third-Party B & B Insulation, Inc., Defendant-Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Stanley Lee West, Sr. And Faye West, as Next Friends and Parents of Stanley Lee West, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Ayoub v. Helm's Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.