Legal Opinion

Asetek Danmark A/S v. Coolit Systems Inc

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 7, 2022No. 3:19-cv-00410Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ASETEK DANMARK A/S, Case No. 19-cv-00410-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 9 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWERS 10 COOLIT SYSTEMS INC, et al., Docket No. 264 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 On August 6, 2021, Defendant and Counter Claimant CoolIT Systems, Inc. (“CoolIT”) and 16 Defendants Corsair Gaming, Inc. and Corsair Memory, Inc. (“Corsair”) filed a motion for leave to 17 amend their answers to assert the affirmative defenses of collateral estoppel and judicial estoppel. 18 Mot. for leave to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API