Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 13, 1980No. 79-845PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing

Defendant, James Stewart, was charged by information with possessing more than 30 grams of cannabis sativa. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 56/á, par. 704(d).) Testimony admitted over defendant’s objections at the bench trial indicated Stewart, without any official recitation of his rights, told a police officer during the booking process that his residence was located at the address where he was arrested and where the cannabis was found. The trial court found Stewart guilty as charged and sentenced him to a period of 18 months’ probation.

On appeal Stewart asks this court to consider (l)(a)…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. The People v. TranowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. The People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. The PEOPLE v. NettlesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. United States of America Ex Rel. Cleveland Hines v. J. E. Lavallee, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, Dannemora, NewyorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. People v. EllisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. BurgosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API