Legal Opinion

United States v. Anaya

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 26, 1985No. 84 CR 934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Eliberto Anaya (“Anaya”) has been charged in a 30-count superseding indictment (the “Indictment”) with violations of federal firearms laws. Each of the odd-numbered counts, charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) (“Section 922(a)(6)”), alleges Anaya knowingly furnished false identification (bearing the name “Jose Ceja”) on a specified date 1 in connection with the acquisition of a firearm from federally licensed firearm dealer R.H. Tasso (“Tasso”). Each even-numbered court, charging a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(a) (“Section 924(a)”),…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Sundry Goods, Wares & Merchandises v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Linda Sue EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3958, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6451 United States of America v. Mary Peggy Moore, United States of America v. Lee Roy WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1994
  5. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3958, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6451 United States of America v. Mary Peggy Moore, United States of America v. Lee Roy WileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API