Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Bennett

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 25, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity. On Exceptions and Appeal by Depend-ant. The case appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtEmery, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant’s intestate were business partners. The defendant was appointed administrator of his intestate’s estate in February, 1889, and he gave the usual notice of his appointment. In the next month, March, 1889, the plaintiff was qualified and authorized as surviving partner to administer the partnership estate and affairs. He did not close that administration and present his final account for allowance until March, 1896. This account, as finally allowed in November, 1896, showed the partnership to be indebted to him in the sum of $1015.81. He brought an action at law…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sykes v. MeachamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  2. In re Estates of WeimerMontgomery County Probate Court · 1937
  3. Agway, Inc. v. LuceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Cribbs v. SturmanTuscarawas County Probate Court · 1933
  5. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API