Legal Opinion
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Wallace
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 11, 1955No. 15588PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
From a judgment for the plaintiff, C. R. Wallace, in a suit against the defendant, Farmers Insurance Exchange, the defendant appealed. The suit was one under contract to collect benefits under an automo bile insurance policy because of the coverage known as “comprehensive”.
Judgment affirmed.
Under the Texas Standard Form of automobile insurance contract prescribed by the Insurance Commission of the State of Texas, “comprehensive” coverage imposes the obligation upon an insurance company to pay “for any direct and accidental loss of or damage to the automobile, hereinafter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Providence Washington Insurance v. ProffittTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- United States Ins. Co. of Waco v. BoyerTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Glens Falls Insurance v. McCownTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Fireman's Ins. Co. of Newark v. WeathermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. v. BerglundTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Federal Insurance Company v. BockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Hughes v. Great American Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Berglund v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Employers' Fire Insurance Co. v. HowsleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.