Legal Opinion
Royal v. Aultman & Taylor Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1888No. 13,118PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From the Fountain Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action by Rebecca Royal against .the Aultman & Taylor Company, of the State of Ohio, and Perry Glascock, sheriff of Fountain county, to enjoin the defendants from selling certain real estate alleged to belong to the plaintiff.
It appears from the complaint that, on the 11th day of November, 1881, the plaintiff was the owner of a tract of land in Fountain county, and that she conveyed it by warranty deed to George ~W. Hyatt on the date above mentioned, subject to .certain conditionsj which are recited in the deed. The *425conditions were, in effect, that Hyatt should pay to the grantor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Ellis v. Elkhart Car Works Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Cory v. CoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Carbon Block Coal Co. v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sheets v. Vandalia Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Ohio Valley Buggy Co. v. Anderson Forging Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Brady v. GregoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Bredell v. KerrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Bonniwell v. MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.