Legal Opinion

State v. Vanderpool

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 10, 2008No. 26402-5-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

¶1 This appeal follows the trial judge’s refusal to suppress drug evidence seized from the defendant, Timothy Vanderpool. The court relied on RCW 46-.20.349 (conferring the right to stop a car if the registered owner’s license is suspended). And the parties here on appeal argue over whether that statute is applicable. It is not. But the officer could legally ask Mr. Vanderpool for identification. That was not a seizure. And the officer had probable cause to arrest Mr. Vanderpool when he volunteered that he did not have a driver’s license, as he handed the officer his identification card. We,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bock v. State Board of Pilotage CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Martha E. FroehlichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. State Of Washington v. Martha E. FroehlichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API