Legal Opinion

City of Hillsboro ex rel Lenchitsky Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Maintenance & Construction Service, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

In this action on a- surety performance bond, in which plaintiff prevailed, the sole issue on appeal is the trial court’s refusal to allow “plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Allowance of Attorney Fees.”

Shortly after the trial, plaintiff submitted to the court a proposed judgment which provided the court with a blank space in which to set forth the amount of attorney fees it deemed reasonable. Filed with the proposed judgment was a “Bill of Disbursements” which did not include an item for attorney fees. On February 2, 1973, defendants objected as follows:

“1. There was no stipulation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Tiano v. ElsensohnOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Town Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. AndersenOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Makarios-Oregon, LLC v. Ross Dress-For-Less, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Rhone v. LouisOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. North Marion School District 15 v. Acstar InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Griffith v. Property and Casualty Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API