Legal Opinion

Bidwell v. Toledo Consol. St. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided February 20, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was a bill bj Benson Bidwell and others against the Toledo Consolidated Street-Railway Company for alleged infringement of a patent. The cause was heard upon an application by complainants for leave to amend their bill by making the General Electric Company a party defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

RICKS, District Judge.

The complainants have made application to this court for leave to amend their bill by making the General Electric Company, a nonresident corporation, a party defendant to this suit. It is not claimed that said proposed defendant is within the jurisdiction of the court, and amenable to its process, or that it can be brought in by original subposna. It is sought to hold it as a defendant in this case because it is alleged the counsel who are preparing and conducting the defense for the Toledo Consolidated Street-Railway Company are the general counsel for said proposed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Lovejoy v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Eagle Manuf'g Co. v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. FelgemakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Felgemaker v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1942
  4. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  5. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API