Legal Opinion

Koch Industries, Inc. v. Haxton

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1976No. 74-1103-D-CivilPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion For Judgment Notwithstanding The Verdict, And In The Alternative Motion For a New Trial, As Supplemented, the Court finds that the same should be overruled in all respects.

Thirty-two grounds are asserted in support of the Motions. Twenty-one complain of the Court’s instructions to the Jury. The Court believes that the Jury was properly instructed in this case and refers to the Court’s instructions and the record made thereon pursuant to Rule 51, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure after the instructions were read to the Jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ziegler v. AkinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  2. Concho Const. Co., Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. Lone Star Producing Company v. JurySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Smith v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. Champlin Petroleum Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API