Scott & Carmody v. Canon
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.
W. H. Willis was the-
common source of title of the land in controversy in this suit. He conveyed it to Eestus Grysup by general warranty deed dated May 29, 1911. The said deed from Willis to Cry- . sup recited a cash consideration of $100 and the further co'nsideration of two promissory notes for $400 and $435, respectively, each *305bearing even date with the deed, the first due May 29, 1912, and the other May 29, 1913, each hearing interest at 10 per cent, per annum, and the payment of each being secured by the retention of an express vendor’s lien on the land.
On September 16, 1913, Willis…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rooney v. PorchTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Ives v. CultonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Canon v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Niles v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Kenley v. RobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. TookeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Spencer v. MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Gillian v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Yett v. Houston Farms Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Hudson v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.