Legal Opinion

In re Smith

New York City Family Court

Decided July 5, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Raymond E. Cornelius, J.

This proceeding, commenced pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, presents the question, which has heretofore been undecided by the courts of this State, whether or not a finding that a child is a “neglected child” may be predicated solely upon prenatal conduct by the mother. “Child” is defined as “any person or persons alleged to have been abused or neglected” (Family Ct Act § 1012 [b]). Under the facts of this case, it is further necessary to determine whether or not an unborn child may be considered a person, in order to receive the protection…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Planned Parenthood Assn. of Kansas City, Mo., Inc. v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. In re Vanesa FNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Alfredo S. v. Nassau County Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. In re RuizWood County Court of Common Pleas · 1986
  4. In re FletcherNew York City Family Court · 1988
  5. PEOPLE ex rel. H.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API