Legal Opinion

Runyan v. . Patterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Civil ActioN tried on appeal from a justice’s judgment at January Special Term, 1881, of Cleaveland Superior Court, before Eure, J. Plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The defendant’s cow, whose vicious propensity to break through the'enclosing barriers and feed upon the growing crops of others, was known to the defendant by repeated acts brought to his notice, made such an irruption into the plaintiff’s cultivated field and committed the damages for which redress is sought in this aetion.

It was in proof that the plaintiff’s fence, varying from a few inches over three feet to a few inches over four feet in height, was insufficient under the requirements of the statute for the protection of the crops it was made to surround, and that the entry of the cow was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wagner v. BissellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  2. Morrison v. . Cornelius and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  3. Burgwyn v. . WhitfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Stoner v. ShugartIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Jones v. . WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API