Legal Opinion

Carle v. Conrail (Consolidated Rail Corp.)

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 9, 1977No. 77 Civ. 298 (CHT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TENNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Robert A. Carle is a Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) Pólice Sergeant currently suspended pending a company trial on several charges of misconduct and violation of company rules. He contends that his suspension and . pending trial are the result of a conspiracy between defendant Lonnie Hamilton, a Conrail Police Inspector, defendant William Trainor, a Conrail Police Sergeant, defendant Conrail itself, and others, to harass and silence him in his attempts to expose the criminal activities of certain Conrail employees. By order to show cause,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  4. Irving Rosen and Sidney A. Kanter v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. James R. Dorsey v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Debtor. Appeal of R. D. Timpany, Etc., in No. 77-1960. Appeal of Consolidated Rail Corporation, in No. 77-2001. Appeal of United States Railway Association, in No. 77-2002. Appeal of United States of America, in No. 77-2104. Appeal of Robert W. Blanchette, in No. 77-2150Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. Marcello v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  3. In re Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API