Sunflower Properties, Inc. v. Yocum

Mikell, Judge.

A jury awarded David Yocum $168,297.66 in his suit against Sunflower Properties, Inc. (“Sunflower”), to recover for services performed pursuant to the parties’ employment contract. Sunflower appeals from the denial of its motion for a new trial. We affirm.

1. Sunflower contends that it is entitled to a new trial because the verdict is contrary to and strongly against the weight of the evidence. We disagree.

The appellate court will not disturb the trial court’s refusal to grant a new trial if there is any evidence at all to support the verdict, however slight, and regardless of…