Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Department of Health

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2002No. 20001103PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1068DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice.

¶ 1 This appeal concerns priority liens and attorney fees related to Medicaid recipients’ settlements with third parties. In this class action lawsuit, the district court certified two classes of plaintiffs, both of which contend on appeal that the State’s priority lien on plaintiffs’ settlement proceeds violates federal law and that the district court erred in granting the State’s motion for judgment on the pleadings on this issue. One class (“Class II plaintiffs”), whose members retained attorneys, also argues that the district court incorrectly granted the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Calvanese v. CalvaneseNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Grey Bear v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Sullivan v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Hale v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Houghton v. Department of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  5. Harris v. AlbrechtUtah Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API