Darling v. Klock
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Appeal by the plaintiff, Henry H. Darling, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor - of the défendant, entered in. the office of the "clerk of the county of. Rensselaer on the 26th day of June, .1896, upon the verdict of a jiiiy, and also from ap order entered in said clerk’s office on the 25th day of July, .1896; denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes. .
1Opinion of the Court
Merwin, J.:
The plaintiff in' this case, claims, tliat, hy reason of. fraudulent representations, made by the defendant or by his authority,, he was *271induced to purchase a large amount of the stock of the Socorro Mountain Mining Company, which was practically worthless, and damages are claimed to the extent of the amount he paid. The verdict of the jury in favor of the defendant is claimed to be against the weight of the evidence.
The first purchase by the plaintiff was on or about the 19th of June, 1890. He then bought of Theodore B. Mills, through J, N. Van Wagner at Troy, 5,000 shares of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Hall v. . NaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Hotchkin v. Third National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Beuerlien v. . O'LearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Wheeler & Wilson Manuf'g Co. v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Niagara Junction Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Marcus v. MarcusNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Charles G. Clapp Co. v. McClearySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Meislahn v. Irving National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- In re Paul Jones & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.