Dominic v. Goldman
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION STEVEN DOMINIC, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:21-cv-394-SPC-NPM STEPHEN R. GOLDMAN, ANN V. GOLDMAN and ANN V. GOLDMAN, Defendants. / ORDER1 Before the Court is a sua sponte review of the Complaint (Doc. 1). District courts are “obligated to inquire into subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte whenever it may be lacking.” Univ. of S. Ala. v. Am. Tobacco Co.,
168 F.3d 405, 410
(11th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff Steven Dominic filed this action— asserting federal-question jurisdiction. The Court disagrees. Dominic contends this action…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christopher J. Weiland v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Vibe Micro, Inc. v. Igor ShabanetsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Travaglio v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.