Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kargman v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 1, 1974No. 73-223-AppealPublished

1DissentJustice Joslin

In my judgment, employment of the “reproduction cost” method to assess the land, buildings and improvements known as the “Kent Farm Village” produces a valuation substantially in excess of the property’s full and fair cash value. The resulting assessment is therefore illegal and, when challenged, should not be allowed to stand. I therefore respectfully dissent.

In appraising the Kent Farm the assessor’s obligation was to ascertain its full and fair cash value, that is, the amount which a willing buyer would probably pay to a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction in a fair *707market. Allen…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  2. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Somers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Golden Gate Corporation v. Barrington CollegeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  5. South County Sand & Gravel Co. v. Bituminous Pavers Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API