Kargman v. Jacobs
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1DissentJustice Joslin
In my judgment, employment of the “reproduction cost” method to assess the land, buildings and improvements known as the “Kent Farm Village” produces a valuation substantially in excess of the property’s full and fair cash value. The resulting assessment is therefore illegal and, when challenged, should not be allowed to stand. I therefore respectfully dissent.
In appraising the Kent Farm the assessor’s obligation was to ascertain its full and fair cash value, that is, the amount which a willing buyer would probably pay to a willing seller in an arm’s length transaction in a fair *707market. Allen…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Somers v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Golden Gate Corporation v. Barrington CollegeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
- South County Sand & Gravel Co. v. Bituminous Pavers Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.