Harbuck v. City of Atlanta

1. In the main, the case is governed'by the decision this d'ay rendered in Whitley v. Atlanta, supra (67 S. E. 108).

2. “By analogy to the rule in misdemeanor eases, all who participate either directly or aceessorially in the violation of a municipal ordinance may be held as principals.” Toney v. Atlanta, 6 Ga. App. 356 (64 S. E. 1106).

3. The evidence, though weak and circumstantial, is not, legally speaking, insufficient to support the conviction. Judgment affirmed.