Parshall v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Crothers, Justice.
[¶ 1] Russell Bruce Parshall appeals from the district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Parshall petitioned the district court to vacate a criminal conviction for refusal to submit to *435 a blood test in 2014. We reverse and remand, concluding the district court erred in its interpretation of the plea agreement.
I
[¶ 2] On July 28, 2015 Parshall pled guilty to "Driving Under the Influence N.D.C.C. § 39-08-01 (First Offense Refusal)" by a N.D.R.Crim.P. 43 plea agreement. Parshall's Rule 43 Change of Plea and Sentencing Appearance Waiver listed the…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morel v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Black Elk v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020