Skolnick v. Skolnick

Plaintiff moves for alimony and counsel fees pendente lite in this separation action. The defendant resists this application by challenging the legality of his marriage to the plaintiff, assigning as his ground the invalidity of a prior Mexican decree of divorce procured by the plaintiff. Plaintiff counters by urging that the defendant induced her procurement of such decree; that he accompanied her to Mexico and paid all the expenses save the legal fees to which he con*1078tributed half and that, immediately after the divorce was granted, plaintiff and defendant were married while still in Mexico.

I…