Legal Opinion

In re A.D.S.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 2019No. COA18-1111Published

1Opinion of the Court

Issues

Respondent-Father asserts the trial court erred by denying Second Counsel's motion to continue the termination hearing and failing to address Second Counsel's motion to withdraw where serious issues of notice were raised, resulting in Respondent-Father being denied his right to fundamentally fair procedures. Respondent-Parents contend the trial court abused its discretion by terminating their parental rights to David after finding adoption was not likely.

Analysis

I. Respondent-Father's Motions to Continue and Withdraw

A parent is "entitled to procedures which provide him with fundamental…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. In re C.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. In re T.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Smith v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. In Re PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API