Legal Opinion
City of Bismarck v. Materi
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1970No. Crim. 394PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Judge, on reassignment.
By complaint dated March 31, 1969, Mr. Materi was charged' with having violated Subsection 13 of Ordinance 22.0401 of the City of Bismarck. Subsection 13 prohibits, with certain exceptions, the conducting of business or labor for profit on Sundays. On being tried for this offense, Mr. Materi was found guilty and sentenced. He thereafter appealed from the sentence of the municipal court to the district court.
In the district court the case was tried on a stipulation of facts, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:
1. That this appeal may be presented to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Braunfeld v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Caldor's, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Giant of Maryland, Inc. v. State's AttorneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Best Products Co., Inc. v. SpaethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WoodworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Warwick v. Almac's, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.